RAF042/2223 - Research on the impact to companies of the EU's Green Taxonomy Framework
This is a contract result notice, not an open opportunity. Details from the official award data.
This sits in the upper-middle of the Research & Development band — a substantial contract for the sector. Based on 20,405 valued Research & Development tenders in our corpus.
***** THIS IS AN AWARD NOTICE, NOT A CALL FOR COMPETITION ***** This procurement is being concluded following a mini competition under the CCS DPS RM6126 Research and Insights.
Brief Description of Requirement The research aim is to improve the evidence base on the expected benefits from a UK green taxonomy, corporate disclosures against such a taxonomy, and understanding any barriers to achieving these by engaging companies who have had to comply with the EU requirements.
More specifically, DBT want this research to: - Identify preparer views towards the framework, as well as the benefits of disclosure for both preparers (i.e., companies) and potential users (i.e., investors and consumers) - for instance, how are the current disclosures (on eligibility) being used, how might alignment disclosures be used in future, and are there any key information gaps that the disclosures would be addressing. - Understand the journey to compliance for EU companies in scope of the EU green taxonomy disclosure obligations - this will provide DBT with a good understanding of the steps to mandatory disclosure. - Identify the most challenging aspects of the compliance journey and the main drivers of cost - this will provide a good understanding of which stages may be more challenging and therefore costly than others. - Identify where amendments should be made along the compliance journey to reduce the burden of compliance and improve the usefulness of information.
What the notice asks for
The research aim is to improve
The research aim is to improve the evidence base on the expected benefits from a UK green taxonomy, corporate disclosures against such a taxonomy, and understanding any barriers to achieving these by engaging companies who have had to comply with the EU requirements.
This will provide DBT with a good
this will provide DBT with a good understanding of the steps to mandatory disclosure.
This will provide a good understanding
this will provide a good understanding of which stages may be more challenging and therefore costly than others.
Identify where amendments should be made along
Identify where amendments should be made along the compliance journey to reduce the burden of compliance and improve the usefulness of information.
Sentences from the notice that state an obligation, surfaced automatically and shown in the order they appear. Not an exhaustive list — always confirm against the tender documents.
What this notice demands of you
1 named, none in explicit obligation language. Each one is quoted from the notice.
This procurement is being concluded following a mini competition under the CCS DPS RM6126 Research and Insights.
Matched against the notice text, so this is a floor — the tender pack will demand things the notice never mentions. “Says must” means the quoted sentence itself used obligation language; anything ambiguous is left as a mention.
Make the case to bid
Reveal who to approach at BEIS, and generate a go-to-market strategy from their news, accounts and people.
Free to start. Named contacts come from published notices; the strategy is generated from the buyer’s news, accounts and people.
- OCID
- 2e78601c-0863-4e2e-92a6-26130d1ac41a
- Stage
- contract · Contract
- Source
- Contracts Finder
- Buyer ref
- tender_313780/1231789
Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source data © Crown copyright.
Who wins this kind of work
The suppliers and buyers around this opportunity — drawn from official award data. Drag to orbit; click a node to explore.
Top suppliers & buyers in Research & Development
BEIS’s tender network