Creative People and Places
The brief Make/Shift is looking for an Evaluator to co-design and deliver an evaluation that identifies if and how our key aims are being met and the most significant changes emerging from our work.
We want a collaborative and reflective evaluation framework that helps us to inform the programme as it develops and to understand what is and isn't working.
It needs to help us learn, reflect, and change as the programme develops.
The evaluation must be accessible to a wide range of audiences, providing them with compelling evidence, insights and stories of impact and change.
We are looking for a supplier to provide the required services over a two year period and are currently working to a budget of £30,000 Context The evaluation needs to clearly answer the three research questions set by our core funder Arts Council England for the national Creative People and Places programme: Are more people from places of least engagement experiencing and inspired by the arts?
To what extent was the aspiration for excellence of art and excellence of the process of engaging communities achieved?
Which approaches were successful and what were lessons learned?
Additionally, we want to assess the impact of the programme and how we are delivering against our vision and Theory of Change for Make/Shift.
The priority is to meet ACE evaluation needs, but we would love to hear your ideas on how we can include evaluative aspects of story collecting, connections to people and place, and creative approaches to evaluation.
The evaluation framework should measure Make/Shift's performance against our stated outputs, outcomes, and impact, as set out in our Theory of Change.
These will be reviewed annually using data from the evaluation and will be reported to our strategic partners and funders including Arts Council England.
Any evaluation framework must take into account that Make/Shift is an action research project, meaning we need to be able to learn quickly from what we're doing and adapt approaches accordingly.
Work required: Evaluation of Make/Shift needs to be an iterative process and include both formative and summative methodology.
Data collection will need to be integrated into all of our activities.
The evaluation needs to inform our approach and decision making at every level, from projects to strategy and longer-term vision.
Evaluation will be a reflective process focused on learning and change.
Therefore, we are looking for a partner to work collaboratively with us on this journey, suggesting how lessons can be fed back into the programme as it develops.
What the supplier must deliver
Make/Shift is looking for an Evaluator
Make/Shift is looking for an Evaluator to co-design and deliver an evaluation that identifies if and how our key aims are being met and the most significant changes emerging from our work.
It needs to help us learn, reflect
It needs to help us learn, reflect, and change as the programme develops.
The evaluation must be accessible to
The evaluation must be accessible to a wide range of audiences, providing them with compelling evidence, insights and stories of impact and change.
We are looking for a supplier
We are looking for a supplier to provide the required services over a two year period and are currently working to a budget of £30,000.
The evaluation needs to clearly answer
The evaluation needs to clearly answer the three research questions set by our core funder Arts Council England for the national Creative People and Places programme:.
Derived from the notice text — always confirm against the original documents.
Make the case to bid
Reveal who to approach at UNIVERSITY OF DERBY, and generate a go-to-market strategy from their news, accounts and people.
The full intelligence dossier
Our agent reads UNIVERSITY OF DERBY’s accounts, hunts live signals, finds the people who decide — and hands you a bid strategy plus a go-to-market influence plan, including what your team should post this week. You approve every paid step.
Ask me about this tender, the buyer, who wins their work, or whether you should bid.
- OCID
- 36cc301c-63fc-41eb-9e50-897d5261d39d
- Stage
- preprocurement · Closed
- Source
- Contracts Finder
- Buyer ref
- PROC JW RFQ 878
Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source data © Crown copyright.
Who wins this kind of work
The suppliers and buyers around this opportunity — drawn from official award data. Drag to orbit; click a node to explore.
Top suppliers & buyers in IT Services
UNIVERSITY OF DERBY’s tender network
Assembling the network…