RFP QuestBeta
Awarded · ResultStage · contract

Birmingham City Council

QU572 - Birmingham Better Mental Health Fund Evaluation - AWARD

Community ServicesCPV 98000000 98300000 98330000 85000000 85300000 73000000 73200000 79000000 79300000 79310000 79311000 75000000 75100000 75120000 72000000 72200000 72220000 85100000 79400000 79410000 85320000 72300000 72310000 73100000 71000000 71600000
Value£51k
Awarded11 Nov 2022
Published29 May 2023
RegionWest Midlands
Outcome — awarded

This is a contract result notice, not an open opportunity. Details from the official award data.

Contract value in context
£51ktotal contract value
median £134k
this tender£0£4.1m

This sits in the lower-middle of the Other Community & Personal Services band — a mid-scale opportunity. Based on 5,835 valued Other Community & Personal Services tenders in our corpus.

The brief

Birmingham City Council (the Council) is seeking for organisations to conduct an evaluation report for our Better Mental Health Fund projects.

During the period 2021-2022, the Council received funding from Public Health England (PHE) now known as Office for Health Improvement and Disparities (OHID) to improve the mental health and wellbeing of Birmingham residents by commissioning a portfolio of projects to address the demand for mental health services and tackle inequalities.

These projects are varied in terms of their size, target groups and the types of intervention.

The Council, as a recipient of this OHID funding, is obligated to submit a local evaluation of the projects that have been commissioned via PHE's Better Mental Health Fund.

The evaluation should add to the evidence-base in terms of effective service delivery and inform policy moving forwards, both policy for the Council specifically and as a contribution to policy on a national level.

The evaluation should increase understanding of the impact of the Better Mental Health Fund on the mental wellbeing of the Birmingham population.

Furthermore, the evaluation should explore the impact of the fund on participants, providers, and provision with the aim of outlining recommendations for the development of future programmes and commissions.

Themes of the evaluation are expected to include the impact of the funding on: o Overview of engagement in the projects in data terms (quantitative) o The participants and their experiences, differences made to them and elements of the programme they liked most and why o Providers' views - what worked well and what did not, what they would like to repeat or change etc, has the funding opened created any new opportunities for them or made them think differently to find solutions? o Gaps in provision (from both individuals and providers) o Any specific elements that worked well for different populations/demographics and explanations for this o Sustainability and legacy of projects o Economic evaluation in terms of cost-effectiveness This contract will be for a period of 4 months.

The maximum budget to cover all the costs is ?65,000 (exclusive VAT).

The Council will be using its free to use e-tendering system (in-tend) for the administration of this procurement process and potential suppliers must register with the system to be able to express an interest.

If you wish to express an interest in this opportunity, please click on the following link to access https://in-tendhost.co.uk/birminghamcc/ and submit your details to register.

You will then be able to log on which will enable you to download all relevant quotation documentation.

If you are unable to register with In-tend or have any questions or problems on how to use this web site please either email us at: cps@birmingham.gov.uk Your completed tender submission should be returned by noon on 11th November 2022...

Key requirements

What the supplier must deliver

01

The evaluation should add to the evidence-base

The evaluation should add to the evidence-base in terms of effective service delivery and inform policy moving forwards, both policy for the Council specifically and as a contribution to policy on a national level.

02

The evaluation should increase understanding of

The evaluation should increase understanding of the impact of the Better Mental Health Fund on the mental wellbeing of the Birmingham population.

03

Furthermore, the evaluation should explore the impact

Furthermore, the evaluation should explore the impact of the fund on participants, providers, and provision with the aim of outlining recommendations for the development of future programmes and commissions.

04

Themes of the evaluation are expected

Themes of the evaluation are expected to include the impact of the funding on:.

05

The Council will be using its free

The Council will be using its free to use e-tendering system (in-tend) for the administration of this procurement process and potential suppliers must register with the system to be able to express an interest.

Derived from the notice text — always confirm against the original documents.

Buyer intelligence

Make the case to bid

Reveal who to approach at Birmingham City Council, and generate a go-to-market strategy from their news, accounts and people.

Source & provenance
OCID
a49a9cdb-f886-458e-b81b-2c0727d6cec3
Stage
contract · Contract
Source
Contracts Finder
Buyer ref
IT-100-3780-QU572 - AWARD
View the original notice on Contracts Finder

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source data © Crown copyright.

Market context

Who wins this kind of work

The suppliers and buyers around this opportunity — drawn from official award data. Drag to orbit; click a node to explore.

Top suppliers & buyers in Other Community & Personal Services

Scroll to explore the market network

Birmingham City Council’s tender network

Assembling the network…