EVALUATION OF MENTAL HEALTH NAMED LEAD AND JOINT TRAINING PILOTS
This is a contract result notice, not an open opportunity. Details from the official award data.
This sits in the upper-middle of the Research & Development band — a substantial contract for the sector. Based on 20,405 valued Research & Development tenders in our corpus.
An evaluation of single point of contact pilots in Schools and CAMHS.
Pilots delivered in 22 areas, covering approximately 250 schools, include identification of named leads and participation on joint working workshops Evaluation to include: - Surveys of CAMHS and school leads - Survey of a sub sample of all schools - Qualitative case studies with 10 schools - Process evaluation of delivery of the pilots Evaluation to assess the extent to which identifying named leads and completing the joint training is associated with: • A change in awareness and knowledge of mental health issues among school leads and CAMHS leads; • A change in processes and systems in relation to mental health, including joint working; • Improvement in the timeliness and appropriateness of referrals from schools to CAMHS; • Activity within schools, driven by the named lead, to disseminate knowledge and culture around mental health; • A change in the knowledge and confidence of wider school staff around supporting children with mental health issues in the classroom; • A change in perceptions of stigma and understanding and confidence in school processes around mental health among pupils. • Sustainability of lead roles after the pilot ends in March 2016 • Impact of changes in practices on specialist services; i.e. are changes in practice or increased knowledge increasing the number or referrals and putting pressure on services. • Differences associated with different delivery models between pilot areas Evaluation also to provide process evaluation of training delivery to: • Consider practicalities of delivering the training, barriers and facilitators to wider roll out.
This should include consideration of the following, alongside any other relevant delivery factors such as: o Capacity of the CAMHS lead o Numbers attending training sessions o Record what was delivered and participants’ views on the quality of training.
What the supplier must deliver
Evaluation also to provide process evaluation
Evaluation also to provide process evaluation of training delivery to:.
This should include consideration of the following
This should include consideration of the following, alongside any other relevant delivery factors such as:.
Derived from the notice text — always confirm against the original documents.
Make the case to bid
Reveal who to approach at DEPARTMENT FOR EDUCATION, and generate a go-to-market strategy from their news, accounts and people.
Ask me about this tender, the buyer, who wins their work, or whether you should bid.
- OCID
- 1886ed82-561e-4164-abd1-fae347eb68ad
- Stage
- contract · Contract
- Source
- Contracts Finder
- Buyer ref
- EOR/SBU/2015010
Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source data © Crown copyright.
Who wins this kind of work
The suppliers and buyers around this opportunity — drawn from official award data. Drag to orbit; click a node to explore.
Top suppliers & buyers in Research & Development
DEPARTMENT FOR EDUCATION’s tender network
Assembling the network…