BIG001-1038 - Independent Complaint Reviewer

The National Lottery Community Fund publishes Business Services work continuously — 25 notices, roughly one every 27 days. This is a stream to watch, not a cycle to wait for.

29% of The National Lottery Community Fund’s awards go to a supplier it has used before.

Which is the argument for getting on the list rather than winning this one. The incumbent is rarely the last winner — it is the roster. See the retention odds by category →

This is a Prior Information Notice (PIN) only: publication and call for competition will be conducted once scope of work is fully defined and approved.

Opportunity The customer complaints process for The National Lottery Community Fund involves a three stage process.

Stages 1 and 2 of the process are internal reviews and stage 3 is an independent review.

Beyond the independent review the customer may approach the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO).

The service being procured is for the independent stage.

Six other lottery distributors are also signed up to this process and would be signatories to the contract.

The additional distributors are Arts Council England, Arts Council Wales, British Film Institute, The National Lottery Heritage Fund, Sport England and UK Sport.

The Lottery Forum have asked that this procurement occurs.

The service required is for an independent complaints reviewer to consider and provide an expert view on the complaint submitted.

This would be to review whether the relevant distributor followed process, whether the processes were fair and if the distributor has acted in a discriminatory manner.

The independent reviewer would liaise with both the distributor and also the customer to collect information and views.

Agreement with both parties on a terms of reference would be achieved.

The independent reviewer would then take their own deliberations and produce a report for both the lottery distributor and customer on their findings.

The independent reviewer can make non-binding recommendations to the relevant distributor to improve processes or practices.

They would not be able to make judgement on whether funding decisions were correct as this is a discretionary power of the distributor.

We are unable to predict how many complaints would reach the independent review stage, therefore contract value may vary based on more or less complaints.

Free to start. Named contacts come from published notices; the strategy is generated from the buyer’s news, accounts and people.

Five included while we’re in beta, and the agent asks before it spends on any paid step.