Supplier
Faithful + Gould Ltd
The contract awards on record for Faithful + Gould Ltd, newest award first, from the award notices on Find a Tender and Contracts Finder. Each is listed as the notice states it. No totals are added.
Search open and past tenders →Records read at Thu 22 Oct 2026, 23:38 BST.
- Read each published award separately.
- Follow a buyer where the corpus has its page.
- Keep framework ceilings separate from amounts awarded.
- This is not the organisation’s complete trading history.
Which award records are on file?
Newest award date first; records with no date come last. A buyer or tender is a link only where the corpus holds its page.
- £163,891Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Procurement support to capital programmeWOLVERHAMPTON CITY COUNCILAwarded 21 Aug 2018£126,900Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Consultancy ServicesUniversity Of The West Of EnglandAwarded 13 Aug 2018£36,597Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Project Management Consultancy ServicesUniversity Of The West Of EnglandAwarded 7 Aug 2018£53,860Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- QS Services for Minor Projects 1WOLVERHAMPTON CITY COUNCILAwarded 21 Mar 2018£52,812Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- 5060-3-Estates-SE-RFI HMP North Sea Camp New Sewer Connection CR BPRN 579/03/8446 Stages 4-7MINISTRY OF JUSTICEAwarded 22 Feb 2018£80,970Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Provision of administrator servicesUniversity Of The West Of EnglandAwarded 24 Jan 2018£34,596Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Services of Masterplan Programme DirectorUniversity Of The West Of EnglandAwarded 19 Jan 2018£36,597Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Project Support Framework (Consultancy): Regional Commercial Manager - LeedsHighways AgencyAwarded 31 Mar 2016 · Framework, as recorded by the source£80,000Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Project Support Framework (Consultancy): Regional Commercial Manager - BedfordHighways AgencyAwarded 31 Mar 2016 · Framework, as recorded by the source£70,000Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Project Support Framework (Consultancy): Regional Commercial Leader - NorthHighways AgencyAwarded 31 Mar 2016 · Framework, as recorded by the source£170,000Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
What do the newest award records show?
This preview follows the current page’s record order. It is a sample, not a complete history or a forecast.
- 01
Spring Vale Primary School Design and PM services
Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- 02
Procurement support to capital programme
Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- 03
Consultancy Services
Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- 04
Project Management Consultancy Services
Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- 05
QS Services for Minor Projects 1
Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
How should you check a record before using it?
Follow its notice page to the original publication, then read the current document and value basis.
A published amount may describe a contract, lot or framework ceiling. The wording beside each record states the basis supplied by the source.
Publications: Find a Tender and Contracts Finder.
- Open the linked tender page and its original publication, where recorded.
- Separate publication, award and response dates.
- Read the value basis; a framework ceiling is not money spent.
- Use the named organisation; do not merge a group parent by assumption.
How much time should you allow to review this page?
Multiply the visible record count by your own review time. Follow-up documents are extra work.
Plan this page’s review
11 records on this page × your minutes per record.
Five minutes is an illustration. Later pages and linked documents are additional work.
- First record5
- Remaining records on this page50
What should you investigate first?
Read the actual award and buyer before using it in research.
- Record01
Open one relevant notice
Keep its identifier and original publication together. - Context02
Separate award from spending
Read whether the amount describes an award or a ceiling. - Evidence03
Read the current documents
Follow scope, lots and updates; resolve missing information through the buyer. - Decision04
Record why it matters
Keep facts separate from eligibility or future-demand assumptions. - Action05
Name a useful follow-up
Follow a named buyer to its published notices where a page exists.
An editorial review sequence, not a buyer timetable or predicted cycle.
What can you safely conclude from these records?
Use the facts each record states. A page of notices or awards does not establish market share, a win rate or future demand.
Review the recorded limitations below. Missing data stays missing, and organisations are linked only when the corpus supplies a page key.
- The corpus and this page are bounded views of published records.
- No organisation-wide spend or awarded-value total is calculated here.
- A named buyer link is not evidence of a wider group relationship.
- Past records do not establish the next opportunity’s date or value.
Where can you investigate next?
Follow recorded buyers where available, or read the guide for your next check.
| Next record or guide | Purpose |
|---|---|
| WOLVERHAMPTON CITY COUNCIL | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| University Of The West Of England | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| MINISTRY OF JUSTICE | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| Highways Agency | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| Understand framework values and call-offs | Understand the next part of the bid |
| Look up previous public contracts | Understand the next part of the bid |
| Choose the next supplier guide | Understand the next part of the bid |
The next decision needs a record someone can check.
What is the useful next action?
Open a relevant notice and establish whether there is work your team should investigate.
Keep the source, uncertainty and decision together.
Explore current and past tenders →- Locate a relevant published notice.
- Follow original documents and the stage.
- Resolve evidence and delivery questions.
- Keep a specific action and its reasons.
What are the limits of this record?
- Award records are grouped by the supplier name as written in award notices, not by company registration. The same company written differently appears separately.
- Each award record is listed separately: a notice awarded to several suppliers, or in several lots, appears once per record.
- Framework awards usually state a ceiling for the whole framework, not money spent. No total is given, because values include ceilings and placeholder amounts.
Where was this record read?
- Supplier
- faithful-gould-ltd
- Read at
- Thu 22 Oct 2026, 23:38 BST
Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source data © Crown copyright.
