Supplier
CATER LINK LIMITED
The contract awards on record for CATER LINK LIMITED, newest award first, from the award notices on Find a Tender and Contracts Finder. Each is listed as the notice states it. No totals are added.
Search open and past tenders →Records read at Fri 23 Oct 2026, 04:49 BST.
- Read each published award separately.
- Follow a buyer where the corpus has its page.
- Keep framework ceilings separate from amounts awarded.
- This is not the organisation’s complete trading history.
Which award records are on file?
Newest award date first; records with no date come last. A buyer or tender is a link only where the corpus holds its page.
- Hales Valley Trust - Catering TenderHales Valley TrustAwarded 9 Feb 2023£992,164Signed contract value
- St John Rigby College ~ Catering TenderSt John Rigby CollegeAwarded 9 Feb 2023£600,692Signed contract value
- £300,000,000Signed contract value; framework ceiling, not spending or guaranteed revenue; shared award/contract amount, this supplier's share is not published
- Catering ServicesThe Keys Academy TrustAwarded 11 Jul 2022£2,914,257Signed contract value
- S4S ~ Cluster 8 ~ Lot 2Services for Schools Ltd (S4S)Awarded 8 Apr 2022£96,882Signed contract value
- Catering Service - Chalgrove Community Primary SchoolAcer TrustAwarded 25 Jun 2021£293,689Signed contract value
- Catering Service - Botley Primary SchoolAcer TrustAwarded 22 Jun 2021£484,367Signed contract value
- Catering Service - Watlington Primary SchoolAcer TrustAwarded 22 Jun 2021£377,535Signed contract value
- £2,673,654Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- £1,674,576Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- £1,100,000Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Carmel College - Tender for Catering Services.The Litmus Partnership LtdAwarded 5 Jul 2018£1,360,000Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Churchfields Academy - Catering TenderChurchfields AcademyAwarded 31 Aug 2017£888,000Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- EMLC Academy Trust ~ Tender for Catering Services.THE LITMUS PARTNERSHIP LTDAwarded 14 Aug 2017£1,217,548Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- £4,605,000Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Fullhurst Community College ~ Tender for Catering Services.THE LITMUS PARTNERSHIP LTDAwarded 14 Aug 2017£1,028,959Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- £530,613Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- £935,848Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- £1,732,995Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- £1,920,898Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Reigate Park Primary School ~ Tender for Catering Services.THE LITMUS PARTNERSHIP LTDAwarded 21 Jul 2017£321,191Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Clyst Vale Community College ~ Tender for Catering Services.THE LITMUS PARTNERSHIP LTDAwarded 21 Jul 2017£1,331,977Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Hereward College - Tender for Catering Services.THE LITMUS PARTNERSHIP LTDAwarded 21 Jul 2017£385,408Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- The Nobel School - Tender for Catering Services.THE LITMUS PARTNERSHIP LTDAwarded 19 Jun 2017£1,470,000Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- St Francis of Assisi Catholic Technology College - Tender for Catering Services.THE LITMUS PARTNERSHIP LTDAwarded 23 May 2017£739,930Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
What do the newest award records show?
This preview follows the current page’s record order. It is a sample, not a complete history or a forecast.
- 01
- 02
- 03
Lot 1 - Education Catering
Signed contract value; framework ceiling, not spending or guaranteed revenue; shared award/contract amount, this supplier's share is not published
- 04
- 05
How should you check a record before using it?
Follow its notice page to the original publication, then read the current document and value basis.
A published amount may describe a contract, lot or framework ceiling. The wording beside each record states the basis supplied by the source.
Publications: Find a Tender and Contracts Finder.
- Open the linked tender page and its original publication, where recorded.
- Separate publication, award and response dates.
- Read the value basis; a framework ceiling is not money spent.
- Use the named organisation; do not merge a group parent by assumption.
How much time should you allow to review this page?
Multiply the visible record count by your own review time. Follow-up documents are extra work.
Plan this page’s review
25 records on this page × your minutes per record.
Five minutes is an illustration. Later pages and linked documents are additional work.
- First record5
- Remaining records on this page120
What should you investigate first?
Read the actual award and buyer before using it in research.
- Record01
Open one relevant notice
Keep its identifier and original publication together. - Context02
Separate award from spending
Read whether the amount describes an award or a ceiling. - Evidence03
Read the current documents
Follow scope, lots and updates; resolve missing information through the buyer. - Decision04
Record why it matters
Keep facts separate from eligibility or future-demand assumptions. - Action05
Name a useful follow-up
Follow a named buyer to its published notices where a page exists.
An editorial review sequence, not a buyer timetable or predicted cycle.
What can you safely conclude from these records?
Use the facts each record states. A page of notices or awards does not establish market share, a win rate or future demand.
Review the recorded limitations below. Missing data stays missing, and organisations are linked only when the corpus supplies a page key.
- The corpus and this page are bounded views of published records.
- No organisation-wide spend or awarded-value total is calculated here.
- A named buyer link is not evidence of a wider group relationship.
- Past records do not establish the next opportunity’s date or value.
Where can you investigate next?
Follow recorded buyers where available, or read the guide for your next check.
| Next record or guide | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Hales Valley Trust | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| St John Rigby College | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| ESPO | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| The Keys Academy Trust | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| Services for Schools Ltd (S4S) | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| Acer Trust | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| THE LITMUS PARTNERSHIP LTD | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| Churchfields Academy | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| Understand framework values and call-offs | Understand the next part of the bid |
| Look up previous public contracts | Understand the next part of the bid |
| Choose the next supplier guide | Understand the next part of the bid |
The next decision needs a record someone can check.
What is the useful next action?
Open a relevant notice and establish whether there is work your team should investigate.
Keep the source, uncertainty and decision together.
Explore current and past tenders →- Locate a relevant published notice.
- Follow original documents and the stage.
- Resolve evidence and delivery questions.
- Keep a specific action and its reasons.
What are the limits of this record?
- Award records are grouped by the supplier name as written in award notices, not by company registration. The same company written differently appears separately.
- Each award record is listed separately: a notice awarded to several suppliers, or in several lots, appears once per record.
- Framework awards usually state a ceiling for the whole framework, not money spent. No total is given, because values include ceilings and placeholder amounts.
Where was this record read?
- Supplier
- cater-link-limited
- Read at
- Fri 23 Oct 2026, 04:49 BST
Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source data © Crown copyright.
