Supplier
Trustmarque Solutions Limited
The contract awards on record for Trustmarque Solutions Limited, newest award first, from the award notices on Find a Tender and Contracts Finder. Each is listed as the notice states it. No totals are added.
Search open and past tenders →Records read at Fri 23 Oct 2026, 12:53 BST.
- Read each published award separately.
- Follow a buyer where the corpus has its page.
- Keep framework ceilings separate from amounts awarded.
- This is not the organisation’s complete trading history.
Which award records are on file?
Newest award date first; records with no date come last. A buyer or tender is a link only where the corpus holds its page.
- Corona HostingHome OfficeAwarded 24 May 2019£434,402Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Adobe acrobat VIP agreementDoncaster MBCAwarded 13 May 2019£72,856Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- PHE - ITC - MS Windows 10 and Office licensing and support (CCS)Public Health EnglandAwarded 30 Apr 2019£5,807,000Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Proposal for the provision of a Pilot / Development Environment to NHS DSPCP PlatformNHS DigitalAwarded 23 Apr 2019£52,752Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Azure SCEHome OfficeAwarded 16 Apr 2019£4,800,000Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Webtrends Renewal 2018NHS DigitalAwarded 16 Apr 2019£75,000Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- BrowserStack Licence RenewalNHS DigitalAwarded 9 Apr 2019£34,469Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Microsoft Azure Enterprise AgreementBlood Services South WestAwarded 12 Mar 2019£1,080,000Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- GB-Glasgow: IBM Storage RefreshStudent Loans CompanyAwarded 7 Mar 2019£1,198,983Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Microsoft Licensing PartnerLeicestershire County CouncilAwarded 4 Mar 2019£2,963,835Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- MHRA Microsoft Licensing RenewalMEDICINES and HEALTHCARE PRODUCTS REGULATORY AGENCYAwarded 22 Jan 2019£3,000,000Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- VAM and SNOWNorth West Ambulance Service Nhs Trust Charitable Fund And Other Related CharitiesAwarded 7 Jan 2019£29,000Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Checkpoint SupportMEDICINES and HEALTHCARE PRODUCTS REGULATORY AGENCYAwarded 19 Dec 2018£20,000Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Azure MicrosoftHealth Education EnglandAwarded 1 Nov 2018Value not stated for this contract; currency not stated
- Proofpoint On PremMEDICINES and HEALTHCARE PRODUCTS REGULATORY AGENCYAwarded 12 Sep 2018£33,929Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Award Notice for Microsoft Enterprise Licence AgreementHS2Awarded 31 Aug 2018£4,900,000Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Microsoft EA RenewalSouth Tyneside CouncilAwarded 23 Jul 2018£133,768Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- GB-Glasgow: PSN Storage KitStudent Loans CompanyAwarded 19 Jul 2018£45,751Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Microsoft Office & SQL LicensesThe Queen Elizabeth Hospital King's Lynn Nhs Foundation TrustAwarded 8 Jun 2018£192,344Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Provision of Mobile Device Licence RenewalCrown Commercial ServiceAwarded 1 May 2018£565,559Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- £32,170Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Microsoft Enterprise Wide Agreement (EWA)COUNTY DURHAM AND DARLINGTON NHS FOUNDATION TRUSTAwarded 27 Feb 2018£2,129,406Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Cloudhouse LicencesUk Intellectual Property OfficeAwarded 5 Jan 2018£47,420Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- HMT - Software Licensing contract extensionCrown Commercial ServiceAwarded 4 Jan 2018£482,000Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Anti - Virus SoftwareUnited Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS TrustAwarded 17 Nov 2017Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
What do the newest award records show?
This preview follows the current page’s record order. It is a sample, not a complete history or a forecast.
- 01
Corona Hosting
Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- 02
Adobe acrobat VIP agreement
Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- 03
PHE - ITC - MS Windows 10 and Office licensing and support (CCS)
Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- 04
Proposal for the provision of a Pilot / Development Environment to NHS DSPCP Platform
Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- 05
Azure SCE
Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
How should you check a record before using it?
Follow its notice page to the original publication, then read the current document and value basis.
A published amount may describe a contract, lot or framework ceiling. The wording beside each record states the basis supplied by the source.
Publications: Find a Tender and Contracts Finder.
- Open the linked tender page and its original publication, where recorded.
- Separate publication, award and response dates.
- Read the value basis; a framework ceiling is not money spent.
- Use the named organisation; do not merge a group parent by assumption.
How much time should you allow to review this page?
Multiply the visible record count by your own review time. Follow-up documents are extra work.
Plan this page’s review
25 records on this page × your minutes per record.
Five minutes is an illustration. Later pages and linked documents are additional work.
- First record5
- Remaining records on this page120
What should you investigate first?
Read the actual award and buyer before using it in research.
- Record01
Open one relevant notice
Keep its identifier and original publication together. - Context02
Separate award from spending
Read whether the amount describes an award or a ceiling. - Evidence03
Read the current documents
Follow scope, lots and updates; resolve missing information through the buyer. - Decision04
Record why it matters
Keep facts separate from eligibility or future-demand assumptions. - Action05
Name a useful follow-up
Follow a named buyer to its published notices where a page exists.
An editorial review sequence, not a buyer timetable or predicted cycle.
What can you safely conclude from these records?
Use the facts each record states. A page of notices or awards does not establish market share, a win rate or future demand.
Review the recorded limitations below. Missing data stays missing, and organisations are linked only when the corpus supplies a page key.
- The corpus and this page are bounded views of published records.
- No organisation-wide spend or awarded-value total is calculated here.
- A named buyer link is not evidence of a wider group relationship.
- Past records do not establish the next opportunity’s date or value.
Where can you investigate next?
Follow recorded buyers where available, or read the guide for your next check.
| Next record or guide | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Home Office | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| Doncaster MBC | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| Public Health England | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| NHS Digital | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| Blood Services South West | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| Student Loans Company | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| Leicestershire County Council | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| MEDICINES and HEALTHCARE PRODUCTS REGULATORY AGENCY | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| North West Ambulance Service Nhs Trust Charitable Fund And Other Related Charities | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| Health Education England | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| HS2 | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| South Tyneside Council | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| The Queen Elizabeth Hospital King's Lynn Nhs Foundation Trust | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| Crown Commercial Service | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| North Tyneside Council | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| COUNTY DURHAM AND DARLINGTON NHS FOUNDATION TRUST | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| Uk Intellectual Property Office | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| Understand framework values and call-offs | Understand the next part of the bid |
| Look up previous public contracts | Understand the next part of the bid |
| Choose the next supplier guide | Understand the next part of the bid |
The next decision needs a record someone can check.
What is the useful next action?
Open a relevant notice and establish whether there is work your team should investigate.
Keep the source, uncertainty and decision together.
Explore current and past tenders →- Locate a relevant published notice.
- Follow original documents and the stage.
- Resolve evidence and delivery questions.
- Keep a specific action and its reasons.
What are the limits of this record?
- Award records are grouped by the supplier name as written in award notices, not by company registration. The same company written differently appears separately.
- Each award record is listed separately: a notice awarded to several suppliers, or in several lots, appears once per record.
- Framework awards usually state a ceiling for the whole framework, not money spent. No total is given, because values include ceilings and placeholder amounts.
Where was this record read?
- Supplier
- trustmarque-solutions-limited
- Read at
- Fri 23 Oct 2026, 12:53 BST
Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source data © Crown copyright.
