Buyer
Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership Ltd
The tender notices in our corpus from Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership Ltd, newest first, read from Find a Tender and Contracts Finder. Each links to its own page and to the original.
- Notices in the corpus
- 26Counted in the corpus search index when this page was read, across every stage (forecast, tender, award, contract). The index is refreshed by the corpus, so the newest notices may be missing for a while.Counted at Fri 23 Oct 2026, 14:35 BST.
- Newest notice published
- 1 Oct 2026
- Buyer type
- OtherThe corpus’s classification from the buyer name, as supplied.
- Read the buyer’s published records, newest first.
- Separate planning, live opportunities and historical outcomes.
- Read the original lot, value basis and documents.
- Investigate relevance before authorising response work.
Which notices has this buyer published?
Open notices are live tenders and forecasts. All notices also include historical ones: awarded, closed or past their deadline.
- National Early Inflammatory Autoimmune Diseases AuditHealthcare Quality Improvement Partnership Ltd · Published 1 Oct 2026The contract is expected to initially be delivered for NHS-funded care in England and Wales, and publicly funded care in Jersey for a period of three years, at a maximum total budget of up to £933,979.20 GBP including VAT and £778,316.00 GBP excluding VAT. Bids exceeding this limit will be rejected.£6,417,788Estimated value stated in the noticeCloses Mon 2 Nov 2026, 12:00 GMT
- National Audit of Care at the End of Life (NACEL)Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership Ltd · Published 14 Aug 2026The National Audit of Care at the End of Life will be for NHS-funded care in England, Wales and Jersey (inclusion other devolved nations/Crown dependencies is yet to be determined and will be detailed within the tender documentation). The initial contract is anticipated to be for a period of 3 yeaValue not stated in sourceForecast · planning
- National Infection and Sepsis Audit – Acute NHS settingsHealthcare Quality Improvement Partnership Ltd · Published 5 Jun 2026The National Infection and Sepsis Audit – Acute NHS settings (NISA-Acute) will be for NHS-funded acute hospital care in England and Wales (inclusion of other Devolved Nations/Crown dependencies is yet to be determined and will be detailed within the tender documentation). The initial contract is a£1,146,300Estimated value stated in the noticeForecast · Planning
- National Joint Registry - Data Management, Solutions, Statistical Analysis, Reporting & Associated ServicesHealthcare Quality Improvement Partnership Ltd · Published 15 May 2026The contract is expected to initially be delivered for a period of 5 years, at a maximum total budget of up to £16,080,000 including VAT and £13,400,000 GBP excluding VAT. Bids exceeding this limit will be rejected. There is potential to extend the contract for up to two additional years as well as£28,400,000Estimated value stated in the noticeForecast · Planning
- National Clinical Audit of PsychosisHealthcare Quality Improvement Partnership Ltd · Published 25 Mar 2026The contract is expected to initially be delivered for NHS-funded care in England and Wales for a period of 3 years, at a maximum total budget of up to £1,269,360 GBP excluding VAT. Bids exceeding this limit will be rejected. There is potential to extend the contract for up to two additional years a£9,115,600Estimated value stated in the noticeForecast · Planning
- National Paediatric Critical Care AuditHealthcare Quality Improvement Partnership Ltd · Published 25 Nov 2025The contract is expected to initially be delivered for NHS-funded care in England, for a period of 3 years, at a maximum total budget of up to £1,296,000 including VAT and £1,080,000 GBP excluding VAT. Bids exceeding this limit will be rejected. There is potential to extend the contract for up to tw£1,080,000Estimated value stated in the noticeForecast · Planning
- National Registry for Robotically Assisted SurgeryHealthcare Quality Improvement Partnership Ltd · Published 13 Nov 2025The contract for the Robotically Assisted Surgery Registry will initially be delivered for NHS-funded care in England, for a period of 3 years, at a maximum total budget of up to £1,050,000 GBP excluding VAT. Bids exceeding this limit will be rejected. There is potential to extend the contract for u£1,050,000Estimated value stated in the noticeForecast · Planning
- Design and Print Services for Healthcare Quality Improvement (HQIP)Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership Ltd · Published 22 Oct 2025Lot 1 – National Joint Registry Annual Report - services The commission of an agency to design the NJR Annual Report and associated supplementary documents. There is a fixed project timeline to work within each year (July to September) and a detailed plan for work will be discussed and created at th£132,000Estimated value stated in the noticeForecast · Planning
- National Neonatal Audit ProgrammeHealthcare Quality Improvement Partnership Ltd · Published 22 Sep 2025The contract is expected to initially be delivered for NHS-funded care in England, Wales, Scotland, and Isle of Man for a period of 3 years, at a maximum total budget of up to £1,026,114 GBP excluding VAT. Bids exceeding this limit will be rejected. There is potential to extend the contract for up t£1,026,114Estimated value stated in the noticeForecast · Planning
- National Paediatric Diabetes AuditHealthcare Quality Improvement Partnership Ltd · Published 11 Sep 2025The contract will initially be delivered for NHS-funded care in England, Wales, and publicly funded care in Jersey for a period of 3 years, at a maximum total budget of up to £1,071,920 GBP excluding VAT. Bids exceeding this limit will be rejected. There is potential to extend the contract for up toValue not stated in sourceForecast · Planning
What has this buyer published most recently?
This preview follows the current page’s record order. It is a sample, not a complete history or a forecast.
- 01
National Early Inflammatory Autoimmune Diseases Audit
Estimated value stated in the notice
- 02
National Audit of Care at the End of Life (NACEL)
Value not stated in source
- 03
National Infection and Sepsis Audit – Acute NHS settings
Estimated value stated in the notice
- 04
National Joint Registry - Data Management, Solutions, Statistical Analysis, Reporting & Associated Services
Estimated value stated in the notice
- 05
National Clinical Audit of Psychosis
Estimated value stated in the notice
How should you check a record before using it?
Follow its notice page to the original publication, then read the current document and value basis.
A published amount may describe a contract, lot or framework ceiling. The wording beside each record states the basis supplied by the source.
Publications: Find a Tender and Contracts Finder.
- Open the linked tender page and its original publication, where recorded.
- Separate publication, award and response dates.
- Read the value basis; a framework ceiling is not money spent.
- Use the named organisation; do not merge a group parent by assumption.
How much time should you allow to review this page?
Multiply the visible record count by your own review time. Follow-up documents are extra work.
Plan this page’s review
10 records on this page × your minutes per record.
Five minutes is an illustration. Later pages and linked documents are additional work.
- First record5
- Remaining records on this page45
What should you investigate first?
Check the notice’s stage and scope before treating it as available work.
- Record01
Open one relevant notice
Keep its identifier and original publication together. - Context02
Separate invitation from outcome
Planning and award notices are not current invitations. - Evidence03
Read the current documents
Follow scope, lots and updates; resolve missing information through the buyer. - Decision04
Record why it matters
Keep facts separate from eligibility or future-demand assumptions. - Action05
Name a useful follow-up
Decide whether preparation work is justified.
An editorial review sequence, not a buyer timetable or predicted cycle.
What can you safely conclude from these records?
Use the facts each record states. A page of notices or awards does not establish market share, a win rate or future demand.
Review the recorded limitations below. Missing data stays missing, and organisations are linked only when the corpus supplies a page key.
- The corpus and this page are bounded views of published records.
- No organisation-wide spend or awarded-value total is calculated here.
- A named buyer link is not evidence of a wider group relationship.
- Past records do not establish the next opportunity’s date or value.
Where can you investigate next?
Use the guides to resolve the notice stage, framework or evidence question.
| Next record or guide | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Search Contracts Finder records | Understand the next part of the bid |
| Separate frameworks from contracts | Understand the next part of the bid |
| Check the invitation’s stage | Understand the next part of the bid |
| Check security evidence | Understand the next part of the bid |
The next decision needs a record someone can check.
What is the useful next action?
Open a relevant notice and establish whether there is work your team should investigate.
Keep the source, uncertainty and decision together.
Explore current and past tenders →- Locate a relevant published notice.
- Follow original documents and the stage.
- Resolve evidence and delivery questions.
- Keep a specific action and its reasons.
What are the limits of this record?
- Notices are linked to this buyer by a slug made from the buyer name on each notice. A notice that writes the name differently may be under another buyer, or none.
- Buyer type is the corpus's classification from the buyer name, not an official category.
Where was this record read?
- Buyer
- healthcare-quality-improvement-partnership-ltd
- Read at
- Fri 23 Oct 2026, 14:35 BST
Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source data © Crown copyright.