Supplier
SMARTSOURCING LIMITED
The contract awards on record for SMARTSOURCING LIMITED, newest award first, from the award notices on Find a Tender and Contracts Finder. Each is listed as the notice states it. No totals are added.
Search open and past tenders →Records read at Fri 23 Oct 2026, 16:23 BST.
- Read each published award separately.
- Follow a buyer where the corpus has its page.
- Keep framework ceilings separate from amounts awarded.
- This is not the organisation’s complete trading history.
Which award records are on file?
Newest award date first; records with no date come last. A buyer or tender is a link only where the corpus holds its page.
- £137,283Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- £106,896Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- £59,375Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- £98,166Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- £84,248Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- £62,400Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- £72,000Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- £139,150Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- SCCM/Intune EngineerOFSTEDAwarded 20 Jul 2023£44,802Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- £144,482Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- £76,723Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- £36,000Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Provision of Change Consultancy Services for Redundancy Payment ServiceThe Insolvency ServiceAwarded 5 Jun 2023£125,640Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Solution ArchitectThe Insolvency ServiceAwarded 16 Dec 2022£114,558Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Test ManagerThe Insolvency ServiceAwarded 16 Dec 2022£56,972Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- A Solution Architecture serviceThe Insolvency ServiceAwarded 29 Nov 2022£72,210Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Technology Delivery TeamThe Insolvency ServiceAwarded 10 Oct 2022£1,630,401Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Project Manager - Application RemediationThe Insolvency ServiceAwarded 30 Aug 2022£104,881Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Project/Delivery ManagerHealth & Safety ExecutiveAwarded 23 Jun 2022£35,081Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- SDRP ResourcesThe Insolvency ServiceAwarded 17 Jun 2022£3,417,453Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- FCMC ResourcesThe Insolvency ServiceAwarded 17 Jun 2022£4,059,325Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Customer Digital Services Project - ResourcesThe Insolvency ServiceAwarded 19 Apr 2022£251,413Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Interim Data & MI AnalystHealth and Safety ExecutiveAwarded 21 Feb 2022£10,560Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- External Communications PR OfficerHealth and Safety ExecutiveAwarded 21 Feb 2022£14,080Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Business AnalystHealth and Safety ExecutiveAwarded 3 Feb 2022£35,676Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
What do the newest award records show?
This preview follows the current page’s record order. It is a sample, not a complete history or a forecast.
- 01
Provision of day rate or AWR workers across all agencies (NCTFTS)
Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- 02
Provision of day rate or AWR workers across all agencies (NCTFTS)
Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- 03
Provision of day rate or AWR workers across all agencies (NCTFTS)
Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- 04
Provision of day rate or AWR workers across all agencies (NCTFTS)
Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- 05
Provision of day rate or AWR workers across all agencies (NCTFTS)
Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
How should you check a record before using it?
Follow its notice page to the original publication, then read the current document and value basis.
A published amount may describe a contract, lot or framework ceiling. The wording beside each record states the basis supplied by the source.
Publications: Find a Tender and Contracts Finder.
- Open the linked tender page and its original publication, where recorded.
- Separate publication, award and response dates.
- Read the value basis; a framework ceiling is not money spent.
- Use the named organisation; do not merge a group parent by assumption.
How much time should you allow to review this page?
Multiply the visible record count by your own review time. Follow-up documents are extra work.
Plan this page’s review
25 records on this page × your minutes per record.
Five minutes is an illustration. Later pages and linked documents are additional work.
- First record5
- Remaining records on this page120
What should you investigate first?
Read the actual award and buyer before using it in research.
- Record01
Open one relevant notice
Keep its identifier and original publication together. - Context02
Separate award from spending
Read whether the amount describes an award or a ceiling. - Evidence03
Read the current documents
Follow scope, lots and updates; resolve missing information through the buyer. - Decision04
Record why it matters
Keep facts separate from eligibility or future-demand assumptions. - Action05
Name a useful follow-up
Follow a named buyer to its published notices where a page exists.
An editorial review sequence, not a buyer timetable or predicted cycle.
What can you safely conclude from these records?
Use the facts each record states. A page of notices or awards does not establish market share, a win rate or future demand.
Review the recorded limitations below. Missing data stays missing, and organisations are linked only when the corpus supplies a page key.
- The corpus and this page are bounded views of published records.
- No organisation-wide spend or awarded-value total is calculated here.
- A named buyer link is not evidence of a wider group relationship.
- Past records do not establish the next opportunity’s date or value.
Where can you investigate next?
Follow recorded buyers where available, or read the guide for your next check.
| Next record or guide | Purpose |
|---|---|
| FCDO Services | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| OFSTED | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| The Insolvency Service | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| Health and Safety Executive | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| Understand framework values and call-offs | Understand the next part of the bid |
| Look up previous public contracts | Understand the next part of the bid |
| Choose the next supplier guide | Understand the next part of the bid |
The next decision needs a record someone can check.
What is the useful next action?
Open a relevant notice and establish whether there is work your team should investigate.
Keep the source, uncertainty and decision together.
Explore current and past tenders →- Locate a relevant published notice.
- Follow original documents and the stage.
- Resolve evidence and delivery questions.
- Keep a specific action and its reasons.
What are the limits of this record?
- Award records are grouped by the supplier name as written in award notices, not by company registration. The same company written differently appears separately.
- Each award record is listed separately: a notice awarded to several suppliers, or in several lots, appears once per record.
- Framework awards usually state a ceiling for the whole framework, not money spent. No total is given, because values include ceilings and placeholder amounts.
Where was this record read?
- Supplier
- smartsourcing-limited
- Read at
- Fri 23 Oct 2026, 16:23 BST
Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source data © Crown copyright.
