Supplier
BECTON DICKINSON UK LTD
The contract awards on record for BECTON DICKINSON UK LTD, newest award first, from the award notices on Find a Tender and Contracts Finder. Each is listed as the notice states it. No totals are added.
Search open and past tenders →Records read at Wed 28 Oct 2026, 18:19 GMT.
- Read each published award separately.
- Follow a buyer where the corpus has its page.
- Keep framework ceilings separate from amounts awarded.
- This is not the organisation’s complete trading history.
Which award records are on file?
Newest award date first; records with no date come last. A buyer or tender is a link only where the corpus holds its page.
- 1LMC - Service-Lab equip Maintenance ContractsNEWCASTLE UNIVERSITYAwarded 9 Apr 2020£94,719Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Provision of FACSVia PlatformPublic Health EnglandAwarded 23 May 2019£64,990Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Contract for LSRFortessa Service RenewalUNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAMAwarded 1 May 2019£28,697Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- 1LMC - Service-Lab Equip Maintenance ContractsNEWCASTLE UNIVERSITYAwarded 11 Apr 2019£95,219Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Flow CytometerUniversity of ExeterAwarded 30 Jan 2019£230,000Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Provision of BACTEC MGIT 960 analyserPublic Health EnglandAwarded 14 Jan 2019£150,000Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- PHE_Scientific- Provision of Bactec FX200 platformsPublic Health EnglandAwarded 14 Jan 2019£140,000Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- 2064/DM - Flow Cytometer Cell SorterUNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELDAwarded 21 Dec 2018£190,000Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Supply of specific BD Laboratory ConsumablesDefra Network eTendering PortalAwarded 30 Jul 2018£124,620Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- £45,583Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Service ContractUNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAMAwarded 21 Sep 2017£41,623Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Service-Lab Equip Maintenance ContractsNEWCASTLE UNIVERSITYAwarded 5 Jun 2017£49,784Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- HEY/15/165 - BLOOD GAS SYRINGESHull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS TrustAwarded 20 Apr 2017£71,415Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Supply of laboratory equipmentNEWCASTLE UNIVERSITYAwarded 24 Oct 2016£698,089Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Flow CytometerUNIVERSITY OF EXETERAwarded 23 Jun 2016£26,000Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- UOE/2015/050/UEMS/WH - Flow CytometerUNIVERSITY OF EXETERAwarded 26 Apr 2016£58,000Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Microbiology AutomationImperial College Healthcare NHS TrustAwarded 22 Mar 2016£2,980,862Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- BL OJEU-RE150361IAH- FLOW CYTOMETERUK SHARED BUSINESS SERVICES LTDAwarded 23 Jul 2015£30,151Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Flow Cytometry and Cell Sorting EquipmentUniversity of WarwickAwarded 19 Mar 2015£699,472Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
What do the newest award records show?
This preview follows the current page’s record order. It is a sample, not a complete history or a forecast.
- 01
1LMC - Service-Lab equip Maintenance Contracts
Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- 02
Provision of FACSVia Platform
Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- 03
Contract for LSRFortessa Service Renewal
Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- 04
1LMC - Service-Lab Equip Maintenance Contracts
Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- 05
Flow Cytometer
Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
How should you check a record before using it?
Follow its notice page to the original publication, then read the current document and value basis.
A published amount may describe a contract, lot or framework ceiling. The wording beside each record states the basis supplied by the source.
Publications: Find a Tender and Contracts Finder.
- Open the linked tender page and its original publication, where recorded.
- Separate publication, award and response dates.
- Read the value basis; a framework ceiling is not money spent.
- Use the named organisation; do not merge a group parent by assumption.
How much time should you allow to review this page?
Multiply the visible record count by your own review time. Follow-up documents are extra work.
Plan this page’s review
19 records on this page × your minutes per record.
Five minutes is an illustration. Later pages and linked documents are additional work.
- First record5
- Remaining records on this page90
What should you investigate first?
Read the actual award and buyer before using it in research.
- Record01
Open one relevant notice
Keep its identifier and original publication together. - Context02
Separate award from spending
Read whether the amount describes an award or a ceiling. - Evidence03
Read the current documents
Follow scope, lots and updates; resolve missing information through the buyer. - Decision04
Record why it matters
Keep facts separate from eligibility or future-demand assumptions. - Action05
Name a useful follow-up
Follow a named buyer to its published notices where a page exists.
An editorial review sequence, not a buyer timetable or predicted cycle.
What can you safely conclude from these records?
Use the facts each record states. A page of notices or awards does not establish market share, a win rate or future demand.
Review the recorded limitations below. Missing data stays missing, and organisations are linked only when the corpus supplies a page key.
- The corpus and this page are bounded views of published records.
- No organisation-wide spend or awarded-value total is calculated here.
- A named buyer link is not evidence of a wider group relationship.
- Past records do not establish the next opportunity’s date or value.
Where can you investigate next?
Follow recorded buyers where available, or read the guide for your next check.
| Next record or guide | Purpose |
|---|---|
| NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| Public Health England | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| UNIVERSITY OF EXETER | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| Defra Network eTendering Portal | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| Hull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| UK SHARED BUSINESS SERVICES LTD | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| University of Warwick | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| Understand framework values and call-offs | Understand the next part of the bid |
| Look up previous public contracts | Understand the next part of the bid |
| Choose the next supplier guide | Understand the next part of the bid |
The next decision needs a record someone can check.
What is the useful next action?
Open a relevant notice and establish whether there is work your team should investigate.
Keep the source, uncertainty and decision together.
Explore current and past tenders →- Locate a relevant published notice.
- Follow original documents and the stage.
- Resolve evidence and delivery questions.
- Keep a specific action and its reasons.
What are the limits of this record?
- Award records are grouped by the supplier name as written in award notices, not by company registration. The same company written differently appears separately.
- Each award record is listed separately: a notice awarded to several suppliers, or in several lots, appears once per record.
- Framework awards usually state a ceiling for the whole framework, not money spent. No total is given, because values include ceilings and placeholder amounts.
Where was this record read?
- Supplier
- becton-dickinson-uk-ltd
- Read at
- Wed 28 Oct 2026, 18:19 GMT
Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source data © Crown copyright.