Supplier
Ove Arup & Partners Limited
The contract awards on record for Ove Arup & Partners Limited, newest award first, from the award notices on Find a Tender and Contracts Finder. Each is listed as the notice states it. No totals are added.
Search open and past tenders →Records read at Sun 25 Oct 2026, 18:02 GMT.
- Read each published award separately.
- Follow a buyer where the corpus has its page.
- Keep framework ceilings separate from amounts awarded.
- This is not the organisation’s complete trading history.
Which award records are on file?
Newest award date first; records with no date come last. A buyer or tender is a link only where the corpus holds its page.
- CAPG Minor TasksRADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT LIMITEDAwarded 2 May 2019£15,000Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Resolution of Generic Operational Safety Case Forward Action PlansRADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT LIMITEDAwarded 17 Apr 2019£159,444Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- South Worcestershire Development Plan Review Infrastructure StudyMalvern Hills District CouncilAwarded 15 Apr 2019£24,350Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Development of a Conceptual Design for a Type B Transport Container for GNS Yellow Box - More detailed Manufacturing Appraisal and Cost EstimateRADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT LIMITEDAwarded 9 Apr 2019£10,189Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Planning Application Evidence Based ResearchFUTURE CITIES CATAPULTAwarded 1 Apr 2019£50,000Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Engineering Design Manual Updates FY18/19 TO FY19/20RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT LIMITEDAwarded 29 Jan 2019£90,784Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- RWM Steering Groups Coordination and Resourcing ManagementRADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT LIMITEDAwarded 28 Jan 2019£34,388Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- GDF CSA Update in Accordance with SyAP's - Phase 1 CSA Update PlanRADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT LIMITEDAwarded 14 Jan 2019£23,385Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Permitting and Consents Capability and Resource Review and Delivery of Permitting and Consent PlansRADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT LIMITEDAwarded 14 Jan 2019£350,000Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- £10,259Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Task Based Support to Configure and Develop RWM Spaces within the HubRADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT LIMITEDAwarded 11 Jan 2019£17,280Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- CAPG Minor Tasks FY18/19 ExtensionRADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT LIMITEDAwarded 7 Jan 2019£150,000Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- £15,876Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Digital Working GroupRADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT LIMITEDAwarded 4 Jan 2019£28,931Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Consultant AppointmentSHEFFIELD HALLAM UNIVERSITYAwarded 14 Nov 2018£52,904Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Appointment of Consultant for Infrastructure Plan for Harlow and Gilston Garden TownEPPING FOREST DISTRICT COUNCILAwarded 22 Aug 2018£52,103Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Contract for the Appointment of Consultancy Services for Digital Innovation StrategyEPPING FOREST DISTRICT COUNCILAwarded 9 May 2018£90,000Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- River Hull Natural Flood Management ProjectHull City CouncilAwarded 10 Apr 2018£76,338Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- SE FRANCHISE EVALUATORSDEPARTMENT FOR TRANSPORTAwarded 12 Mar 2018£208,390Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Winchester Sport & Leisure Park - Fire ServicesWINCHESTER CITY COUNCILAwarded 28 Feb 2018£35,000Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Perceptions of UK Rail in Overseas marketsDEPARTMENT FOR TRANSPORTAwarded 28 Feb 2018£94,389Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Winchester Sport & Leisure Park - BREEAM servicesWINCHESTER CITY COUNCILAwarded 28 Feb 2018£31,500Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Winchester Sport & Leisure Centre Project - Civil and Structural Engineering Design ServicesWINCHESTER CITY COUNCILAwarded 20 Feb 2018£330,000Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Support for Co-ordination of Community Engagement TrainingRADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT LIMITEDAwarded 8 Feb 2018£18,507Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Deliverables related to development of conceptual design for Type B Transport container for GNS Yellow box & SSBRADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT LIMITEDAwarded 8 Feb 2018£299,896Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
What do the newest award records show?
This preview follows the current page’s record order. It is a sample, not a complete history or a forecast.
- 01
CAPG Minor Tasks
Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- 02
Resolution of Generic Operational Safety Case Forward Action Plans
Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- 03
South Worcestershire Development Plan Review Infrastructure Study
Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- 04
Development of a Conceptual Design for a Type B Transport Container for GNS Yellow Box - More detailed Manufacturing Appraisal and Cost Estimate
Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- 05
Planning Application Evidence Based Research
Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
How should you check a record before using it?
Follow its notice page to the original publication, then read the current document and value basis.
A published amount may describe a contract, lot or framework ceiling. The wording beside each record states the basis supplied by the source.
Publications: Find a Tender and Contracts Finder.
- Open the linked tender page and its original publication, where recorded.
- Separate publication, award and response dates.
- Read the value basis; a framework ceiling is not money spent.
- Use the named organisation; do not merge a group parent by assumption.
How much time should you allow to review this page?
Multiply the visible record count by your own review time. Follow-up documents are extra work.
Plan this page’s review
25 records on this page × your minutes per record.
Five minutes is an illustration. Later pages and linked documents are additional work.
- First record5
- Remaining records on this page120
What should you investigate first?
Read the actual award and buyer before using it in research.
- Record01
Open one relevant notice
Keep its identifier and original publication together. - Context02
Separate award from spending
Read whether the amount describes an award or a ceiling. - Evidence03
Read the current documents
Follow scope, lots and updates; resolve missing information through the buyer. - Decision04
Record why it matters
Keep facts separate from eligibility or future-demand assumptions. - Action05
Name a useful follow-up
Follow a named buyer to its published notices where a page exists.
An editorial review sequence, not a buyer timetable or predicted cycle.
What can you safely conclude from these records?
Use the facts each record states. A page of notices or awards does not establish market share, a win rate or future demand.
Review the recorded limitations below. Missing data stays missing, and organisations are linked only when the corpus supplies a page key.
- The corpus and this page are bounded views of published records.
- No organisation-wide spend or awarded-value total is calculated here.
- A named buyer link is not evidence of a wider group relationship.
- Past records do not establish the next opportunity’s date or value.
Where can you investigate next?
Follow recorded buyers where available, or read the guide for your next check.
| Next record or guide | Purpose |
|---|---|
| RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT LIMITED | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| Malvern Hills District Council | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| FUTURE CITIES CATAPULT | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| SHEFFIELD HALLAM UNIVERSITY | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| EPPING FOREST DISTRICT COUNCIL | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| Hull City Council | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| DEPARTMENT FOR TRANSPORT | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| WINCHESTER CITY COUNCIL | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| Understand framework values and call-offs | Understand the next part of the bid |
| Look up previous public contracts | Understand the next part of the bid |
| Choose the next supplier guide | Understand the next part of the bid |
The next decision needs a record someone can check.
What is the useful next action?
Open a relevant notice and establish whether there is work your team should investigate.
Keep the source, uncertainty and decision together.
Explore current and past tenders →- Locate a relevant published notice.
- Follow original documents and the stage.
- Resolve evidence and delivery questions.
- Keep a specific action and its reasons.
What are the limits of this record?
- Award records are grouped by the supplier name as written in award notices, not by company registration. The same company written differently appears separately.
- Each award record is listed separately: a notice awarded to several suppliers, or in several lots, appears once per record.
- Framework awards usually state a ceiling for the whole framework, not money spent. No total is given, because values include ceilings and placeholder amounts.
Where was this record read?
- Supplier
- ove-arup-amp-partners-limited
- Read at
- Sun 25 Oct 2026, 18:02 GMT
Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source data © Crown copyright.