Supplier
RSK ADAS Limited
The contract awards on record for RSK ADAS Limited, newest award first, from the award notices on Find a Tender and Contracts Finder. Each is listed as the notice states it. No totals are added.
Search open and past tenders →Records read at Wed 28 Oct 2026, 19:02 GMT.
- Read each published award separately.
- Follow a buyer where the corpus has its page.
- Keep framework ceilings separate from amounts awarded.
- This is not the organisation’s complete trading history.
Which award records are on file?
Newest award date first; records with no date come last. A buyer or tender is a link only where the corpus holds its page.
- 5672 - Biodiversity Offsetting SchemeLondon Borough of BexleyAwarded 9 Jul 2024£190,000Signed contract value
- RDE419 Development of a simple nutrient loss tool based on Farmscoper outputsNatural EnglandAwarded 8 Jul 2024£13,912Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Evaluating the agronomic and environmental impacts of slurry separationRSK ADAS LtdAwarded 4 Jul 2024£2,428,586Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Provision of services for horticultural statisticsNatural EnglandAwarded 28 May 2024£370,583Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Provision of services for horticultural statisticsDefra Network eTendering PortalAwarded 16 May 2024£370,583Signed contract value
- RDE599 Cruiser SB further assessment of neonicotinoid degradation in soils and plantsDepartment for Environment, Food & Rural AffairsAwarded 1 May 2024£69,195Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- C23751 - Classical Scrapie in Iceland, a model for prion diseases worldwide (ADAS)Animal and Plant Health AgencyAwarded 28 Mar 2024£93,965Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- eDNA Kits, analysis of returned samples, and associated reporting - Lot 2Natural EnglandAwarded 20 Mar 2024£65,800Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- RDE 523 - Building the evidence base on the impacts of the UK Timber RegulationsDEFRAAwarded 15 Mar 2024£74,690Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- RDE 524 - Building the evidence base on the impacts of the UK Timber RegulationsEAAwarded 15 Mar 2024£74,800Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- £241,419Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- RDE 513 Peat use and source in English and Welsh Whisky productionDepartment for Environment, Food & Rural AffairsAwarded 27 Feb 2024£45,153Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- NUTS II Revision Report SupportDfTc - Department for TransportAwarded 26 Feb 2024£24,950Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- eDNA Kits, analysis of returned samples, and associated reporting - Lot 2NATURAL ENGLAND (Defra Network eTendering Portal)Awarded 22 Feb 2024£65,800Signed contract value
- RDE 373 - Farming at higher water tables on peatDefraAwarded 1 Feb 2024£34,448Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Lot 5 Dundee City Resurvey of Ash TreesDundee City CouncilAwarded 1 Feb 2024 · Framework, as recorded by the source£90,000Signed contract value; framework ceiling, not spending or guaranteed revenue; shared award/contract amount, this supplier's share is not published
- Economics of Sustainable Farming SchemeWelsh GovernmentAwarded 17 Jan 2024£367,638Signed contract value
- Imported Food StandardsFood Standards AgencyAwarded 2 Jan 2024£39,973Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- RDE 359 - Review of agricultural land take to developmentNEAwarded 21 Dec 2023£49,494Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- RDE 451 - IPM instructional videosDEFRAAwarded 28 Nov 2023£56,445Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- FaLMA/CSFSW015Natural EnglandAwarded 16 Nov 2023£289,665Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- FaLMA/CSFEE010 Lot 5NEAwarded 16 Nov 2023£198,788Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Development and Evaluation of a Free to Use Nutrient Management Planning Tool, and Longitudinal Research - Contract Variation)Department for Environment, Food & Rural AffairsAwarded 15 Nov 2023£105,888Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- FaLMA/CSFYN013 Lot 2NEAwarded 13 Nov 2023£146,628Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- RDE 377 - Audit of Natural England-managed National Nature Reserve (NNR) RecordsNatural EnglandAwarded 10 Nov 2023£37,524Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
What do the newest award records show?
This preview follows the current page’s record order. It is a sample, not a complete history or a forecast.
- 01
- 02
RDE419 Development of a simple nutrient loss tool based on Farmscoper outputs
Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- 03
Evaluating the agronomic and environmental impacts of slurry separation
Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- 04
Provision of services for horticultural statistics
Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- 05
Provision of services for horticultural statistics
Signed contract value
How should you check a record before using it?
Follow its notice page to the original publication, then read the current document and value basis.
A published amount may describe a contract, lot or framework ceiling. The wording beside each record states the basis supplied by the source.
Publications: Find a Tender and Contracts Finder.
- Open the linked tender page and its original publication, where recorded.
- Separate publication, award and response dates.
- Read the value basis; a framework ceiling is not money spent.
- Use the named organisation; do not merge a group parent by assumption.
How much time should you allow to review this page?
Multiply the visible record count by your own review time. Follow-up documents are extra work.
Plan this page’s review
25 records on this page × your minutes per record.
Five minutes is an illustration. Later pages and linked documents are additional work.
Estimated review time125 minutesSource: Your inputs and this page · Visible record count
125 minminutes
- First record5
- Remaining records on this page120
Planning estimate for 25 records read at Wed 28 Oct 2026, 19:02 GMT; not a measured average or a total for the organisation.
What should you investigate first?
Read the actual award and buyer before using it in research.
- Record01
Open one relevant notice
Keep its identifier and original publication together. - Context02
Separate award from spending
Read whether the amount describes an award or a ceiling. - Evidence03
Read the current documents
Follow scope, lots and updates; resolve missing information through the buyer. - Decision04
Record why it matters
Keep facts separate from eligibility or future-demand assumptions. - Action05
Name a useful follow-up
Follow a named buyer to its published notices where a page exists.
An editorial review sequence, not a buyer timetable or predicted cycle.
What can you safely conclude from these records?
Use the facts each record states. A page of notices or awards does not establish market share, a win rate or future demand.
Review the recorded limitations below. Missing data stays missing, and organisations are linked only when the corpus supplies a page key.
- The corpus and this page are bounded views of published records.
- No organisation-wide spend or awarded-value total is calculated here.
- A named buyer link is not evidence of a wider group relationship.
- Past records do not establish the next opportunity’s date or value.
Where can you investigate next?
Follow recorded buyers where available, or read the guide for your next check.
| Next record or guide | Purpose |
|---|---|
| London Borough of Bexley | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| Natural England | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| RSK ADAS Ltd | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| Defra Network eTendering Portal | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| Animal and Plant Health Agency | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| DEFRA | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| EA | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| DfTc - Department for Transport | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| NATURAL ENGLAND (Defra Network eTendering Portal) | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| Dundee City Council | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| Welsh Government | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| Food Standards Agency | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| NE | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| Understand framework values and call-offs | Understand the next part of the bid |
| Look up previous public contracts | Understand the next part of the bid |
| Choose the next supplier guide | Understand the next part of the bid |
The next decision needs a record someone can check.
What is the useful next action?
Open a relevant notice and establish whether there is work your team should investigate.
Keep the source, uncertainty and decision together.
Explore current and past tenders →- Locate a relevant published notice.
- Follow original documents and the stage.
- Resolve evidence and delivery questions.
- Keep a specific action and its reasons.
What are the limits of this record?
- Award records are grouped by the supplier name as written in award notices, not by company registration. The same company written differently appears separately.
- Each award record is listed separately: a notice awarded to several suppliers, or in several lots, appears once per record.
- Framework awards usually state a ceiling for the whole framework, not money spent. No total is given, because values include ceilings and placeholder amounts.
Where was this record read?
- Supplier
- rsk-adas-limited
- Read at
- Wed 28 Oct 2026, 19:02 GMT
Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source data © Crown copyright.