Supplier
Phoenix Software Limited
The contract awards on record for Phoenix Software Limited, newest award first, from the award notices on Find a Tender and Contracts Finder. Each is listed as the notice states it. No totals are added.
Search open and past tenders →Records read at Wed 28 Oct 2026, 19:02 GMT.
- Read each published award separately.
- Follow a buyer where the corpus has its page.
- Keep framework ceilings separate from amounts awarded.
- This is not the organisation’s complete trading history.
Which award records are on file?
Newest award date first; records with no date come last. A buyer or tender is a link only where the corpus holds its page.
- DA from the Link: IT Solutions 2 (Digital Workplace Solutions) FW for Phoenix Managed Service 2026-29Stockton-on-tees Borough CouncilAwarded 31 May 2026£54,000Published award value
- Category Management SolutionsMINISTRY OF DEFENCEAwarded 29 May 2026£298,600Published award value
- Provision of an Endpoint Management and Monitoring SolutionDfTc - Department for TransportAwarded 29 May 2026£750,000Published award value
- Renewal of ITSM SoftwareUNIVERSITY OF KEELEAwarded 28 May 2026£167,160Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- DevOps PlatformNorth Lincolnshire CouncilAwarded 28 May 2026£39,371Signed contract value
- Microsoft Azure OverageBritish Transport PoliceAwarded 27 May 2026£525,000Published award value
- Jira License RenewalGloucestershire County CouncilAwarded 24 May 2026£24,573Signed contract value
- Microsoft EES Licensing Agreement (Jisc Chest Framework Call-Off)SHARE MULTI ACADEMY TRUSTAwarded 21 May 2026 · Framework, as recorded by the source£295,428Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- AT1424 - Microsoft Licensing - Additional YearLuton CouncilAwarded 21 May 2026£1,440,000Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- IT Health DashboardUnited Lincolnshire Teaching Hospitals NHS TrustAwarded 21 May 2026£166,804Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Provision of Microsoft Licenses and Related ServicesLondon Borough of Hammersmith & FulhamAwarded 20 May 2026£4,431,572Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Provision of a fully managed VPN serviceOFFICE FOR STANDARDS IN EDUCATION, CHILDRENS SERVICES AND SKILLSAwarded 20 May 2026£331,920Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Reactive Proactive IT Support Contract RenewalHull City CouncilAwarded 18 May 2026£50,000Signed contract value
- Veeam Backup and Recovery Licences 26/27UK Health Security AgencyAwarded 15 May 2026£320,878Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Provision of a fully managed VPN serviceOFFICE FOR STANDARDS IN EDUCATION, CHILDRENS SERVICES AND SKILLSAwarded 14 May 2026£331,920Published award value
- Renewal of ITSM SoftwareUNIVERSITY OF KEELEAwarded 13 May 2026£167,160Published award value
- Provision of Microsoft Licenses and Related ServicesLondon Borough of Hammersmith & FulhamAwarded 13 May 2026£4,431,572Published award value
- ServiceNow Software LicencesLondon Borough of BarnetAwarded 13 May 2026 · Framework, as recorded by the source£2,364,675Signed contract value; framework ceiling, not spending or guaranteed revenue
- Veeam RenewalCumberland CouncilAwarded 12 May 2026£31,642Signed contract value
- SFO-IS&T-RM6098-Provision of IT ServicesSERIOUS FRAUD OFFICEAwarded 8 May 2026£9,000,000Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- Non-Microsoft Licenses - TenableBritish Business BankAwarded 8 May 2026£27,535Signed contract value
- Microsoft Licensing Direct Award - AWARDSheffield CollegeAwarded 7 May 2026£750,000Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- IT Consultancy ServicesORBIT GROUP LIMITEDAwarded 7 May 2026£465,811Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- DutySheet for Specials and PSVsBritish Transport PoliceAwarded 6 May 2026£30,365Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- £50,869Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
What do the newest award records show?
This preview follows the current page’s record order. It is a sample, not a complete history or a forecast.
- 01
DA from the Link: IT Solutions 2 (Digital Workplace Solutions) FW for Phoenix Managed Service 2026-29
Published award value
- 02
- 03
Provision of an Endpoint Management and Monitoring Solution
Published award value
- 04
Renewal of ITSM Software
Legacy award value; supplier allocation and signed-contract status unverified
- 05
How should you check a record before using it?
Follow its notice page to the original publication, then read the current document and value basis.
A published amount may describe a contract, lot or framework ceiling. The wording beside each record states the basis supplied by the source.
Publications: Find a Tender and Contracts Finder.
- Open the linked tender page and its original publication, where recorded.
- Separate publication, award and response dates.
- Read the value basis; a framework ceiling is not money spent.
- Use the named organisation; do not merge a group parent by assumption.
How much time should you allow to review this page?
Multiply the visible record count by your own review time. Follow-up documents are extra work.
Plan this page’s review
25 records on this page × your minutes per record.
Five minutes is an illustration. Later pages and linked documents are additional work.
- First record5
- Remaining records on this page120
What should you investigate first?
Read the actual award and buyer before using it in research.
- Record01
Open one relevant notice
Keep its identifier and original publication together. - Context02
Separate award from spending
Read whether the amount describes an award or a ceiling. - Evidence03
Read the current documents
Follow scope, lots and updates; resolve missing information through the buyer. - Decision04
Record why it matters
Keep facts separate from eligibility or future-demand assumptions. - Action05
Name a useful follow-up
Follow a named buyer to its published notices where a page exists.
An editorial review sequence, not a buyer timetable or predicted cycle.
What can you safely conclude from these records?
Use the facts each record states. A page of notices or awards does not establish market share, a win rate or future demand.
Review the recorded limitations below. Missing data stays missing, and organisations are linked only when the corpus supplies a page key.
- The corpus and this page are bounded views of published records.
- No organisation-wide spend or awarded-value total is calculated here.
- A named buyer link is not evidence of a wider group relationship.
- Past records do not establish the next opportunity’s date or value.
Where can you investigate next?
Follow recorded buyers where available, or read the guide for your next check.
| Next record or guide | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Stockton-on-tees Borough Council | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| MINISTRY OF DEFENCE | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| DfTc - Department for Transport | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| UNIVERSITY OF KEELE | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| North Lincolnshire Council | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| British Transport Police | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| Gloucestershire County Council | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| SHARE MULTI ACADEMY TRUST | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| Luton Council | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| United Lincolnshire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| OFFICE FOR STANDARDS IN EDUCATION, CHILDRENS SERVICES AND SKILLS | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| Hull City Council | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| UK Health Security Agency | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| London Borough of Barnet | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| Cumberland Council | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| SERIOUS FRAUD OFFICE | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| British Business Bank | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| Sheffield College | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| ORBIT GROUP LIMITED | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| National Institute for Health and Care Excellence | Explore the buyer’s published notices |
| Understand framework values and call-offs | Understand the next part of the bid |
| Look up previous public contracts | Understand the next part of the bid |
| Choose the next supplier guide | Understand the next part of the bid |
The next decision needs a record someone can check.
What is the useful next action?
Open a relevant notice and establish whether there is work your team should investigate.
Keep the source, uncertainty and decision together.
Explore current and past tenders →- Locate a relevant published notice.
- Follow original documents and the stage.
- Resolve evidence and delivery questions.
- Keep a specific action and its reasons.
What are the limits of this record?
- Award records are grouped by the supplier name as written in award notices, not by company registration. The same company written differently appears separately.
- Each award record is listed separately: a notice awarded to several suppliers, or in several lots, appears once per record.
- Framework awards usually state a ceiling for the whole framework, not money spent. No total is given, because values include ceilings and placeholder amounts.
Where was this record read?
- Supplier
- phoenix-software-limited
- Read at
- Wed 28 Oct 2026, 19:02 GMT
Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source data © Crown copyright.